ADVOCATE’S IMMUNITY REVISITED AND EXPLAINED: GREGORY IAN ATTWELLS & ANOR v JACKSON LALIC LAWYERS PTY LTD [2016] HCA 16 (4 May 2016)

  • Author : Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb - 24-05-2016

Introduction

The High Court of Australia allowed an appeal from the New South Wales Court of Appeal, reaffirming the scope of advocate’s immunity in Australia which extends to work done both in and outside court. A majority of the Court held however, that the immunity does not extend to the negligent provision of advice by a lawyer, which leads to the settlement of a case by agreement between the parties embodied in consent orders. Significantly, legal advice must contribute to a judicial determination of the issues for advocate’s immunity to be attracted.

pdf-logo newClick here to download the paper 

About the Author

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb

Recent Posts

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb reappointed by the International Council of Arbitration for Sport

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb Date: 16-05-2023

Legal Professional Privilege - The Latest from the High Court of Australia

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb Date: 20-08-2019

Anthony Lo Surdo SC nominated for Mediator of the Year

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb Date: 03-08-2017

Is leave required to enforce an equitable charge against a bankrupt?

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb Date: 26-06-2017

David Kendirijian v Eugene Lepore & Anor [2017] HCA 13

Anthony Lo Surdo SC FCIArb Date: 22-04-2017