Business records provided to assignee – s 60(1)(d) of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic)

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 27-05-2011

Some people hold the view that a statement that accords with s. 52 of the Estate Agents Act 1980 (Vic) will be sufficient to satisfy s. 60(1)(d) of the RLA (section 60(1) is extracted in my earlier post today).


  1. the RLA does not define a “business record”;
  2. a s. 52 statement is a form completed by the vendor of a business and it is not clear that this would be a business record for the purposes of s. 60(1)(d); and
  3. in any event, s. 52 statements allow for data in the preceding two years, not three as required by s. 60(1)(d) (although this could be remedied by amending the form).

Consequently, solicitors should think twice before advising their clients that completing a s 52 statement will satisfy s 60(1)(d).

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

CTRS Regulations – 30 September 2021 is approaching fast …

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-09-2021

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper Date: 24-08-2021

Wait times in the Building and Property list at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 20-08-2021

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-12-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-11-2020

Double win for the Tigers and a win for tenants in the Court of Appeal

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-10-2020