Exercising an option out of time: Weemah Park Pty Ltd v Glenlaton Investments Pty Ltd [2011] QCA 150 (24 June 2011)

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 05-07-2011

In a recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision, the tenant had purported to exercise its option out of time.

The Court upheld the primary judge’s finding that:

  1. the purported exercise of an option out of time constituted an offer by the tenant to enter a new lease on the same terms as the option;  and
  2. the Court can look to the conduct of the parties after the formation of the alleged contract to determine whether a contract has been formed.

While the law applied by the Court is settled and not controversial, the decision serves as a reminder to landlords and tenants to properly document the creation or otherwise of a lease or agreement to lease to avoid uncertainty and protracted litigation, particularly after the exercise of an option.

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

Repudiation by a landlord who failed to investigate a suspected defect: Brotherhood of St Laurence v Sarina Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 46 (26 March 2024)

Samuel Hopper Date: 03-04-2024

A new practice for listing trials in the Building and Property List at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 28-11-2023

The Limitation of Actions Act and contribution claims under the Wrongs Act at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 15-09-2023

Ongoing issues with VCAT’s jurisdiction and the length of VCAT’s lists

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-04-2023

A lease is not retail unless it is ‘open to the public in the required sense’

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-07-2022

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper Date: 02-02-2022