Latent defects and builder’s responsibility to the OC

  • Author : Tiphanie Acreman - 08-10-2014

In Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288 & anor [2014] HCA 36, the High Court rejected the notion that a builder owes a duty of care to an owners corporation for pure economic loss arising from latent defects in common property.  The case turned on whether the owners corporation was “vulnerable” in the relevant sense.  The commercial nature of the development and the detailed contractual framework between the developer and the builder, and the developer and the purchasers of the lots that provided for how defects would be dealt with, were factors weighing against vulnerability.

About the Author

Tiphanie Acreman

Recent Posts

Common property boundaries and the Water Act – who is liable for unreasonable flows of water into an apartment?

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 06-08-2019

Revised residential noise regulations

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 23-10-2018

Non-compliant cladding update

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 19-10-2018

Supreme Court confirms that OCs must carry out works to common property to avoid discrimination against persons with disabilities

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 29-06-2018

Which Prevails – the OC Rules or the Planning Permit Conditions?

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 21-06-2018

OCs may be obliged to carry out works to upgrade access for persons with disabilities

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 18-02-2018