Recent cases on under the Retail Leases Act 2003 – Part I

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 28-11-2011

The Tribunal has handed down two interesting cases on costs in the retail tenancies list in the last few weeks.

In Jones and Anor v Globeoz Consultant Pty Ltd and Anor (Retail Tenancies) [2011] VCAT 2102, Senior Member Walker ordered the respondent to pay costs under s 92 of the RLA 2003 because it failed to attend a mediation at the Office of the Small Business Commissioner.

This is the first case that I am aware of in which the Tribunal ordered a party to pay costs for refusing to attend or withdrawing from mediation or other form of alternative dispute resolution.

A refusal to attend or withdrawal from mediation enlivens the Tribunal's jurisdiction to award costs, but it does not automatically mean that costs will be awarded. However, the case highlights the importance of attending mediation or other form of alternative dispute resolution in retail leasing cases.

Thanks to Mark Shramme and Jamie Bedelis for alerting me to this case.

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

CTRS Regulations – 30 September 2021 is approaching fast …

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-09-2021

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper Date: 24-08-2021

Wait times in the Building and Property list at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 20-08-2021

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-12-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-11-2020

Double win for the Tigers and a win for tenants in the Court of Appeal

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-10-2020