‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined – part II

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 14-01-2012

A few people have requested a copy of the reasons in the recent County Court decision in Evans & Ors v Thurau Pty Ltd [2011] VCC 1444 on the meaning of the word 'use' in an Alpine lease.

An earlier post on the decision is available here.

The decision has not made its way to AustLii yet. If you are interested in the decision, a copy is attached here. The relevant discussion is contained in paragraphs [66] to [85] of the reasons.

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

Repudiation by a landlord who failed to investigate a suspected defect: Brotherhood of St Laurence v Sarina Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 46 (26 March 2024)

Samuel Hopper Date: 03-04-2024

A new practice for listing trials in the Building and Property List at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 28-11-2023

The Limitation of Actions Act and contribution claims under the Wrongs Act at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 15-09-2023

Ongoing issues with VCAT’s jurisdiction and the length of VCAT’s lists

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-04-2023

A lease is not retail unless it is ‘open to the public in the required sense’

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-07-2022

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper Date: 02-02-2022