An OC cannot make rules that discriminate against lot owners

  • Author : Tiphanie Acreman - 18-12-2013

A rule of the OC was declared invalid on the basis that it was discriminatory in Metro Real Estate Services Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation No 1 – PS511424U [2013] VCAT 2138. The rule excluded owners and occupiers from the common area gymnasium, swimming pool and sauna unless the owner or occupier had first undertaken an induction for the recreation area. The induction sessions were only offered on Monday mornings. This effectively excluded occupiers of short term serviced apartments in the development from using the recreation facilities. The Tribunal held that the rule was discriminatory against the owners of the serviced apartments and was therefore invalid.

The Tribunal also reinforced that the OC Committee does not have the power to make, amend or add to the rules of the OC. That can only be done by a special resolution of the lot owners.



About the Author

Tiphanie Acreman

Recent Posts

Common property boundaries and the Water Act – who is liable for unreasonable flows of water into an apartment?

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 06-08-2019

Revised residential noise regulations

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 23-10-2018

Non-compliant cladding update

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 19-10-2018

Supreme Court confirms that OCs must carry out works to common property to avoid discrimination against persons with disabilities

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 29-06-2018

Which Prevails – the OC Rules or the Planning Permit Conditions?

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 21-06-2018

OCs may be obliged to carry out works to upgrade access for persons with disabilities

Tiphanie Acreman Date: 18-02-2018