No s.146 notice required for contractual right to terminate

  • Author : Robert Hay QC - 07-02-2012

Leases often provide that the landlord may re-enter premises and end the lease if a guarantor becomes bankrupt. In N.C.Reid & Co Pty Ltd v Pencarl Pty Ltd [2011] VCAT2241 the guarantor became bankrupt, the landlord re-entered the premises and leased the premises to a new tenant.

The tenant claimed, among other things, that the landlord should have served a notice under s.146 of the Property Law Act 1958 because the lease had been terminated "for repudiation" with the consequence that the tenant would have had 14 days to remedy the breach.

The tenant's claim was unsuccessful. Judge O'Neill held that the lease had been terminated pursuant to a contractual right and not because of a repudiation of the lease and therefore a notice that complied with s.146 did not have to be served. His Honour also said that in if there were a breach it could not have been rectified.

About the Author

Robert Hay QC

Recent Posts

The Mortgagee’s Power of Sale

Robert Hay QC Date: 18-10-2019

“Retail premises leases” cannot jump out of the Retail Leases Act 2003

Robert Hay QC Date: 04-10-2019

Retail premises leases can “jump out” of the Retail Leases Act

Robert Hay QC Date: 01-08-2019

High Court affirms traditional test for enforcing oral contracts based on acts of part performance

Robert Hay QC Date: 20-11-2018

Estate agents’ commission fiasco to be fixed

Robert Hay QC Date: 26-06-2018

VCAT loses jurisdiction to hear a dispute where a party is not resident in Victoria

Robert Hay QC Date: 24-04-2018