Swanton’s case doubted

  • Author : Robert Hay KC - 27-11-2011

In Stone v Leonardis [2011] SASC 153 the Supreme Court of South Australia held at [36] that in principle a registered proprietor could lodge a caveat on title to protect its own interests.

In Stone the registered proprietor lodged a caveat preventing a mortgagee of the land settling on a contract of sale. The registered proprietor's allegation was the mortgagee had improperly exercised the power of sale by entering into a contract for less than the market value.

It has been held in Victoria that in such circumstances a mortgagor did not have an equitable interest but had a mere equity to set the sale aside. See: Swanton Mortgage Pty Ltd v Trepan Investments Pty Ltd [1994] 1 VR 672 andVasiliou v Westpac Banking Corporation (2008) 19 VR 229. White J held that Swanton was "clearly wrong" and that the court would not follow it. However, in the circumstances of the case His Honour decied that the caveat should be removed.

About the Author

Robert Hay KC

Recent Posts

Public law claim not an “equity” for the purposes of an “in personam” claim”against title of a registered proprietor of land

Robert Hay KC Date: 09-04-2024

New Publication: Commercial Tenancy Law, 5th edition

Robert Hay KC Date: 16-01-2024

The Mortgagee’s Power of Sale

Robert Hay KC Date: 18-10-2019

“Retail premises leases” cannot jump out of the Retail Leases Act 2003

Robert Hay KC Date: 04-10-2019

Retail premises leases can “jump out” of the Retail Leases Act

Robert Hay KC Date: 01-08-2019

High Court affirms traditional test for enforcing oral contracts based on acts of part performance

Robert Hay KC Date: 20-11-2018