An appeal has been filed in the Supreme Court from the VCAT decision in Swan v Uecker (Residential Tenancies)  VCAT 483 and should be heard later this year.
In Swan v Uecker a residential tenant put the leased property on Airbnb without the landlord’s consent. The landlord then served a notice to vacate on the basis that the tenant had wrongly sub-let the property. The Tribunal held that the notice was ineffective because the arrangements between the tenant and the Airbnb guests did not amount to a sub-lease. Reference was made to the Airbnb standard terms and conditions.
There has been some recent press over the decision and I have received inquiries about it, so it appears that the outcome of the appeal will be significant.
That significance is amplified by:
- the Victorian Supreme Court decision in Janusauskas v Director of Housing  VSC 650, which upheld a decision from the Tribunal in Director of Housing v Janusaukas (Residential Tenancies)  VCAT 42 to make a possession order when a public housing tenant had used his apartment on a similar website known as ‘Couchsurfing’. In that case, the Tribunal found that the arrangements between the tenant and the ‘couch surfers’ constituted a sub-lease; and
- the recent VCAT decision of Alex Taxis Pty Ltd v Knight (Residential Tenancies) VCAT 528 in which VCAT held that guests from Airbnb did not occupy the residence as sub-tenants (see paras  to ).
Follow my blog for further updates as they emerge.