Serene Hotels Pty Ltd v Epping Hotels Pty Ltd appeal dismissed

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 26-08-2015

August 27, 2015

The Court of Appeal today dismissed an appeal from Croft J’s decision in Epping Hotels Pty Ltd v Serene Hotels Pty Ltd [2015] VSC 104.
 
The decision at first instance and the appeal before Croft J are discussed here and here.
 
The first decision from VCAT held that the use of the profits method to determine rent during a rent review was prohibited by s 37(2) of the RLA 2003.
 
During the appeal before Croft J and in the Court of Appeal, the tenant argued that the profits method was not prohibited by the RLA 2003, but that s 37(2) of that Act required the specialist retail valuer to adjust the figures that he considered to account for the costs of acquiring gaming machines and gaming entitlements.

 

Both Croft J and the Court of Appeal rejected those arguments, finding that the way in which the specialist retail valuer used the profits method was not prohibited by s 37(2) of the RLA 2003.

This decision is significant because:
 
the methodology used by the specialist retail valuer in this case is used widely by valuers who specialise in the hotel and gaming industries;
the text of s 37(2) of the RLA 2003 is substantially replicated in interstate retail leasing legislation and in a large number of Victorian leases that are not governed by the RLA 2003;  and
consequently, a significant number of rental determinations could have been challenged if the appeal was successful.
A copy of the Court of Appeal’s reasons is available here.

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

CTRS Regulations – 30 September 2021 is approaching fast …

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-09-2021

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper Date: 24-08-2021

Wait times in the Building and Property list at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 20-08-2021

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper Date: 23-12-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-11-2020

Double win for the Tigers and a win for tenants in the Court of Appeal

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-10-2020