Third floor determination

  • Author : Samuel Hopper - 11-10-2011

Given developments over the last few days, I thought it would be worth doing a single post on the validity of the third floor determination.

The relevant dates are as follows:

  • 15 April 2003 – the RLA 2003 received Royal assent;
  • 29 April 2003 – date of third floor determination;
  • 30 April 2003 – Gazette entry publishing third floor determination;  and
  • 1 May 2003 – s 5(1) of the RLA 2003 came into force.

In a hearing last week, the County Court expressed the view that the third floor determination may not be valid because the determination is made under s 5(1) of the RLA 2003 and was made on 29 April 2003, but s 5(1) did not come into force until 1 May 2003.


 

However, Robert Hay, in a post on his blog, pointed out that the instrument appears to be valid under s 13 of the Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984.

Section 13 of the ILA states that:

(1) This section applies where an Act or a provision of an Act which does not come into operation immediately on the passing of the Act will, on its coming into operation, confer power or amend another Act so as to confer power under the other Act as so amended to—

(a)     make subordinate instruments or any other instruments of a legislative or administrative character; or

(f)     do any other thing—

for the purposes of that Act or provision or that other Act.

(2) Unless the contrary intention appears, the power may be exercised at any time after the passing of the Act but its exercise does not confer a right or impose an obligation on a person before the coming into operation of the Act or provision except insofar as is necessary or expedient for the purpose of—

(a)     bringing the Act or provision into operation; or

(b)     making the Act or provision or the other Act as amended fully effective at or after that coming into operation.

(3) Without limiting subsection (2), an appointee may exercise a power, and a body may meet and exercise a power, under that subsection before the coming into operation of the Act or provision in the same manner and subject to the same conditions or limitations (if any) and with an entitlement to payment of the same remuneration or allowances (if any) as if the Act or provision were in operation.

As the RLA 2003 was passed on or before 15 April 2003, sub-s 13(2) of the ILA appears to be sufficient to save the determination.

A copy of the determination is available here.

About the Author

Samuel Hopper

Recent Posts

Repudiation by a landlord who failed to investigate a suspected defect: Brotherhood of St Laurence v Sarina Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VSCA 46 (26 March 2024)

Samuel Hopper Date: 03-04-2024

A new practice for listing trials in the Building and Property List at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 28-11-2023

The Limitation of Actions Act and contribution claims under the Wrongs Act at VCAT

Samuel Hopper Date: 15-09-2023

Ongoing issues with VCAT’s jurisdiction and the length of VCAT’s lists

Samuel Hopper Date: 05-04-2023

A lease is not retail unless it is ‘open to the public in the required sense’

Samuel Hopper Date: 19-07-2022

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper Date: 02-02-2022