Loading

The danger of WorkSafe notices when repair and maintenance is required

Author : Samuel Hopper SC - 20-05-2011

I am asked occasionally whether by both landlords and tenants whether they should call a WorkSafe inspector to serve a notice on the other party who is refusing to complete certain works on the property. In summary, I think it is a very bad idea.

Section 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act), which states that:

A person who (whether as an owner or otherwise) has, to any extent, the management or control of a workplace must ensure so far as is reasonably practicable that the workplace and the means of entering and leaving it are safe and without risks to health.

Penalty: 1800 penalty units for a natural person; 9000 penalty units for a body corporate.


WorkSafe inspectors have the power to serve notices requiring compliance with that section.

While I have heard of instances where this has been used to force a party to conduct repairs to a property, I would not recommend trying this for the following reasons:

  1. there are degrees of management and control and more than one person can have management and control of a workplace;
  2. the use of the words ‘whether as an owner or otherwise’ reinforce the conclusion that both a landlord and a tenant can be liable under that section;
  3. calling in a WorkSafe Inspector introduces uncertainty. In one case I worked on, a WorkSafe Inspector served an improvement notice on a tenant requiring it to upgrade a lift. After the tenant sold its business and informed the inspector that it had left the premises, the Inspector withdrew the notice and issued a new one, this time to the landlord;
  4. if review of a notice is not sought within 21 days, the recipient of the notice commits an offence if it is not complied with;
  5. fighting a notice in VCAT is a long and costly exercise that takes place in a jurisdiction where costs are rarely ordered; and
  6. if the Inspector concludes that a breach has occurred, charges can be brought even without an accident or injury. The penalties are severe and there are restrictions on the costs that can be recovered, even if the charges are successfully defended.

Consequently, it would be a brave landlord or tenant that calls in a WorkSafe Inspector to resolve a leasing dispute!

About The Author

Samuel Hopper SC

Recent Posts

The RLA 2003 permits a ‘late exit’ part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Epping Hotel v Serene Hotels appeal

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on outgoings …

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A general update for the leasing community…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Willmott appeal heard

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Retail Tenancies Amendment Bill 2012

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease – part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

The Mortgagee’s Power Sale 3rd edition out soon

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is a serviced apartment a retail premises lease?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Calderbank offers in the retail tenancies list

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on s 251 of the Building Act

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Michael Redfern

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

FEA decision – special leave application filed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

New Small Business Commissioner appointed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination part 3

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Recent press over shopping centre leases

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Adverse possession of disused laneways

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Relief from forfeiture of a franchise agreement

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Quirk in s.64 nothing to get excited about

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Article – interview of Mark McInnes

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Managed Investment Scheme discussion paper

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

“Hotel” does not require accomodation

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Setting off costs of capital works

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is an eBay business a retail premises?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Rent payable “without deduction”

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

VCAT jurisdiction over interstate residents

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Practice note: When is a road not a road?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘or’ means ‘or’ in 15 year determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Appeal – is an Airbnb guest a sub-tenant?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A hidden trap in s 28 notices

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Lifestyle appeal refused

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Loading
The danger of WorkSafe notices when repair and maintenance is required | Greens List