Loading

Landmark decision about exit fees and rent charged to dead residents in over-55s land lease communities

Author : Samuel Hopper SC - 09-07-2025

Greens List barristers Sam Hopper SC and Eli Fryar represented a group of residents who were successful this week in an application brought against the operators of the Wollert Lifestyle Community (Lifestyle). The application concerned the validity of exit fees in residents’ Residential Site Agreements (RSA) and covenants that allow rent to be charged after a resident dies.  

 

Residents typically buy a home from Lifestyle and rent land on which the home is located, and are then required to enter an RSA which requires them to pay an exit fee, calculated as a percentage of the price when they on-sell their homes. Also, on the death of a resident, the RSA says their estate must keep paying rent but they are not able to occupy the home.


A group of residents were successful this week in an application brought against the operators of the Wollert Lifestyle Community (Lifestyle). The application concerned the validity of exit fees in residents’ Residential Site Agreements (RSA) and covenants that allow rent to be charged after a resident dies.  


Residents typically buy a home from Lifestyle and rent land on which the home is located, and are then required to enter an RSA which requires them to pay an exit fee, calculated as a percentage of the price when they on-sell their homes.  Also, on the death of a resident, the RSA says their estate must keep paying rent but they are not able to occupy the home.

VCAT President Justice Woodward delivered his ruling on Monday, 7 July 2025, finding that: 


  1. exit fees in RSAs could not be charged if the amount of those fees is not disclosed up front.  As the amount of a resident’s exit fees is not known until sale, Lifestyle’s model of exit fees as a percentage of sale price can never comply with and cannot be charged under s 206S of the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic) (RTA);  and
  2. to require grieving relatives of a deceased resident to pay rent but not be able to occupy the home is ‘harsh, if not unconscionable’, and the RSAs are to be varied under s 206G of the RTA to allow the estate of a deceased resident to sub-let the home before sale.

The decision will have flow-on affects for residents not only at Wollert Lifestyle Community, but any resident at the 24 operating Lifestyle Communities in Victoria with these kinds of clauses in their RSAs.


See below links to Justice Woodward’s ruling and recent media coverage by The Age and Sam’s interview with ABC Radio National Breakfast.


https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/retirees-saved-from-financial-prison-in-landmark-decision-against-developer-20250707-p5md3v.html


https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/lifestyle-communities/105509634


https://jade.io/article/1142439?at.hl=Lifestyle+Management+2+Pty+Ltd

About The Author

Samuel Hopper SC

Recent Posts

The RLA 2003 permits a ‘late exit’ part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Epping Hotel v Serene Hotels appeal

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on outgoings …

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A general update for the leasing community…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Willmott appeal heard

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Retail Tenancies Amendment Bill 2012

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease – part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

The Mortgagee’s Power Sale 3rd edition out soon

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is a serviced apartment a retail premises lease?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Calderbank offers in the retail tenancies list

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on s 251 of the Building Act

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Michael Redfern

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

FEA decision – special leave application filed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

New Small Business Commissioner appointed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination part 3

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Recent press over shopping centre leases

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Adverse possession of disused laneways

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Relief from forfeiture of a franchise agreement

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Quirk in s.64 nothing to get excited about

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Article – interview of Mark McInnes

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Managed Investment Scheme discussion paper

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

“Hotel” does not require accomodation

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Setting off costs of capital works

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is an eBay business a retail premises?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Rent payable “without deduction”

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

VCAT jurisdiction over interstate residents

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Practice note: When is a road not a road?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘or’ means ‘or’ in 15 year determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Appeal – is an Airbnb guest a sub-tenant?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A hidden trap in s 28 notices

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Lifestyle appeal refused

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Loading
Landmark decision about exit fees and rent charged to dead residents in over-55s land lease communities | Greens List