Loading

Application of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) to leases of 15 years or more: LFRACM INC v Halski Pty Ltd [2025] VCC 1506

Author : Samuel Hopper SC - 12-11-2025

Many readers will be familiar with the Ministerial determination that excludes lease with a term of 15 years or more (and certain other related leases) from the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). For those who are not, a copy of that determination is available by following the link here.


The 15 year determination has been a source of some controversy since it was first published in 2004. His Honour Judge Macnamara in the County Court of Victoria recently gave detailed consideration to the meaning and effect of that determination in the case of LFRACM INC v Halski Pty Ltd & Anor [2025] VCC 1506 (16 October 2025) and in his Honour’s supplementary reasons in LFRACM INC v Halski Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2025] VCC 1557.


The headline from his Honour’s decision is that:


  1. a lease will not invoke the 15 year determination to exclude that lease from the RLA 2003 if it does not contain specific obligations to undertake substantial work that can be identified when the lease was entered into; and
  2. a general ‘keep in repair’ covenant is not sufficient, even if the covenant extends to any capital works that may arise during the term.


The decision also considered an argument (which his Honour did not accept) that the parties to a lease deed containing a covenant that the 15 year determination applies to the lease are estopped from denying that the determination applies.


So far as I am aware, this is the first time that the 15 year determination was considered by a court. In the current climate of increasing state taxes on land, this decision is likely to prove significant in those industries in which leases of 15 years or more are commonplace.


Ben Kelly and I recently prepared a paper that considers his Honour’s decision, its background and implications in some detail. The paper goes into these issues in quite a lot of detail, so I have provided a link to the whole paper here.


This paper originally appeared on https://samhopperbarrister.com

About The Author

Samuel Hopper SC

Recent Posts

The RLA 2003 permits a ‘late exit’ part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Epping Hotel v Serene Hotels appeal

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on outgoings …

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A general update for the leasing community…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Willmott appeal heard

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Retail Tenancies Amendment Bill 2012

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease – part 2

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

The Mortgagee’s Power Sale 3rd edition out soon

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on disclaimer of a lease

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is a serviced apartment a retail premises lease?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Calderbank offers in the retail tenancies list

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

More on s 251 of the Building Act

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Michael Redfern

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘Use’ in an Alpine lease defined

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

FEA decision – special leave application filed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

New Small Business Commissioner appointed

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination part 3

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Third floor determination – part II

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Recent press over shopping centre leases

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Adverse possession of disused laneways

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Relief from forfeiture of a franchise agreement

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Quirk in s.64 nothing to get excited about

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Article – interview of Mark McInnes

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Managed Investment Scheme discussion paper

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

“Hotel” does not require accomodation

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Setting off costs of capital works

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Is an eBay business a retail premises?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Rent payable “without deduction”

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First comments the new CTRS Regs

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CTRS Regulations – My First Comments

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

CRTS extension has been gazetted and published

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

First VCAT decision about the CTRS…

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

VCAT jurisdiction over interstate residents

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Practice note: When is a road not a road?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

‘or’ means ‘or’ in 15 year determination

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Appeal – is an Airbnb guest a sub-tenant?

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

A hidden trap in s 28 notices

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Lifestyle appeal refused

Samuel Hopper SC

Date : 25-03-2020

Loading
Application of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) to leases of 15 years or more: LFRACM INC v Halski Pty Ltd [2025] VCC 1506 | Greens List